How does comparative negligence impact slip and fall cases?

On Behalf of | Jan 6, 2025 | Slip-and-Fall Accidents |

Slip and fall accidents can lead to serious injuries and unexpected challenges. When pursuing a claim for damages, understanding how Florida’s comparative negligence laws apply is crucial. This legal principle can significantly impact the amount of compensation an injured person may receive.

What is comparative negligence?

Florida follows the rule of comparative negligence in personal injury cases, including slip and fall claims. Under this system, a court assigns a percentage of fault to each party involved in the incident. If the injured person shares responsibility for the accident, their compensation will decrease proportionally. For example, if someone is found 20% at fault, their total award will reduce by that percentage.

How comparative negligence applies to slip and fall claims

Slip and fall cases often involve disputes about who is responsible for the accident. Property owners have a duty to maintain safe premises, but injured individuals must also exercise reasonable care. For example, a court may assign partial fault to someone who ignored a clearly marked warning sign or failed to pay attention to their surroundings. The property owner may also share responsibility if hazards like wet floors or uneven surfaces were not addressed promptly.

Proving fault in a slip and fall case

To recover compensation in a slip and fall claim, the injured party must prove the property owner’s negligence. This includes showing that the owner knew or should have known about the dangerous condition and failed to fix it. Evidence such as photographs, witness statements, and incident reports can strengthen a case. However, if the defendant argues that the injured person’s actions contributed to the fall, comparative negligence will determine the outcome.

Awareness of comparative negligence laws is essential for anyone pursuing a slip and fall claim in Florida. These rules can directly affect the compensation available and highlight the importance of building a strong case to minimize the percentage of fault attributed to the injured person.

Archives

attorneys Brad Culpepper and Brett J. Kurland